Skip to content

📦 TinaDocs | Remove styled-components #3252

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
ssw-yakshaver bot opened this issue Apr 10, 2025 · 1 comment
Closed

📦 TinaDocs | Remove styled-components #3252

ssw-yakshaver bot opened this issue Apr 10, 2025 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@ssw-yakshaver
Copy link

ssw-yakshaver bot commented Apr 10, 2025

Requested by: @isaaclombardssw via YakShaver.ai 🦬
cc: @isaaclombardssw, @Marxoz, @wicksipedia, @adamcogan

Hi Team!

  🟥  Watch the video (1 min 2 sec)

  

Pain

The current documentation for Tina.io includes examples using styled-components, which is no longer a recommended approach for styling. We need to update the documentation to remove styled-components and replace it with more modern and recommended styling methods such as Tailwind CSS or class variance authority.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. All instances of styled-components are removed from the Tina.io documentation.
  2. Examples using styled-components are replaced with examples using Tailwind CSS or class variance authority.
  3. The updated documentation is reviewed and approved by the team.
  4. Ensure that the documentation is suitable for public use without references to deprecated styling methods.

Screenshot

Screenshot
Figure: Styled components deprecated; remove for public use.

@isaaclombardssw isaaclombardssw changed the title ✨ Remove styled-components from Tina.io Docs 📦 TinaDocs | Remove styled-components Apr 10, 2025
@amankumarrr amankumarrr self-assigned this Apr 15, 2025
@amankumarrr
Copy link
Contributor

this one is completed by this PR - tinacms/tina-docs#18

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants