Skip to content

Allow to continue interrupted map() #1099

Open
@mgirlich

Description

@mgirlich

For me the main advantage of a for loop over map() in an interactive context is that I can easily continue the for loop after an interruption. An example workflow I regularly have:

slow_function <- function(x) {
  if (x == 5) {
    stop("something went wrong")
  }
  
  x
}

to_process <- 1:10
results <- list()
for (i in to_process) {
  results[[i]] <- slow_function(i)
}
#> Error in slow_function(i): something went wrong

print(i)
#> [1] 5
# now fix `slow_function()`

slow_function <- function(x) {
  x
}

for (j in to_process[-(1:(i - 1))]) {
  results[[j]] <- slow_function(j)
}

print(results)
#> [[1]]
#> [1] 1
#> 
#> [[2]]
#> [1] 2
#> 
#> [[3]]
#> [1] 3
#> 
#> [[4]]
#> [1] 4
#> 
#> [[5]]
#> [1] 5
#> 
#> [[6]]
#> [1] 6
#> 
#> [[7]]
#> [1] 7
#> 
#> [[8]]
#> [1] 8
#> 
#> [[9]]
#> [1] 9
#> 
#> [[10]]
#> [1] 10

Created on 2023-09-05 with reprex v2.0.2

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    featurea feature request or enhancement

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions