-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Final map improvements #61
Comments
I added some basic styling (underlined text) for regions/points where catalogue items are directly referenced. I experimented with backgrounds but they become too prominent, and since Claire wanted those styles removed earlier I think a more minimal approach is better here. At this point making other style changes to those items should be pretty easy, so let me know if you have something else in mind. |
What I was hoping to accomplish with the region styling was to downplay the regions relative to the sites so that they felt more a part of the background or topography of the map. I think they're still too dominant here. the individual sites need to pop out more I think. And I don't think the underline is enough. Is there something more we can do? Claire didn't like the white background label style when it was applied to ALL of the sites right? Did we ever do a version with just the 5 catalogue sites? |
One problem is there are catalogue items connected with both "features" and "regions", which are different both in styles and behavior. Do you want me to treat items with catalogue entries differently from both of these other categories? |
If that's easier, sure. I think it's worth trying. |
Here's the latest map, btw. I'm adding this to the PDF version. |
@egardner looks great. Has Claire seen it? |
Don't think so, no. |
@geealbers, do you want to send it to her or shall I? |
Terrific. @ruthlane if you can send it, that would be great. Thanks |
Done |
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: