Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Final map improvements #61

Closed
5 tasks done
geealbers opened this issue Jan 19, 2016 · 10 comments
Closed
5 tasks done

Final map improvements #61

geealbers opened this issue Jan 19, 2016 · 10 comments

Comments

@geealbers
Copy link
Member

  • Remove "South Italy"; Move Calabria to its modern-day position in the toe of the boot.
  • Adjust styling of regions label text to be more visually minimal (perhaps with thin sans serif, or lighter text color or both)
  • Add styling to the location labels with catalogue numbers associated with them to distinguish from other locations. Perhaps giving them the blue-gray background and white text, or similar level of call out.
  • Review with Claire
  • Make similar adjustments to print version of map as needed
egardner added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 19, 2016
@egardner
Copy link
Contributor

I added some basic styling (underlined text) for regions/points where catalogue items are directly referenced. I experimented with backgrounds but they become too prominent, and since Claire wanted those styles removed earlier I think a more minimal approach is better here. At this point making other style changes to those items should be pretty easy, so let me know if you have something else in mind.

@geealbers
Copy link
Member Author

What I was hoping to accomplish with the region styling was to downplay the regions relative to the sites so that they felt more a part of the background or topography of the map. I think they're still too dominant here. the individual sites need to pop out more I think.

And I don't think the underline is enough. Is there something more we can do? Claire didn't like the white background label style when it was applied to ALL of the sites right? Did we ever do a version with just the 5 catalogue sites?

@egardner
Copy link
Contributor

One problem is there are catalogue items connected with both "features" and "regions", which are different both in styles and behavior. Do you want me to treat items with catalogue entries differently from both of these other categories?

@geealbers
Copy link
Member Author

If that's easier, sure. I think it's worth trying.

@egardner
Copy link
Contributor

Here's the latest map, btw. I'm adding this to the PDF version.

map.pdf

@ruthlane
Copy link
Contributor

@egardner looks great. Has Claire seen it?

@egardner
Copy link
Contributor

Don't think so, no.

@ruthlane
Copy link
Contributor

@geealbers, do you want to send it to her or shall I?

@geealbers
Copy link
Member Author

Terrific. @ruthlane if you can send it, that would be great. Thanks

@ruthlane
Copy link
Contributor

Done

egardner added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 9, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants