Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Relax condition of atom ordering #32

Open
tfrederiksen opened this issue Mar 6, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Relax condition of atom ordering #32

tfrederiksen opened this issue Mar 6, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone
Compatibility wit...

Comments

@tfrederiksen
Copy link
Owner

Currently Inelastica expects the atoms to be ordered in the following blocks:

[buffer-left] (optional)
[electrode-left]
[device]
[electrode-right]
[buffer-right] (optional)

but such constraints are no longer present in transiesta. In a step towards full multiterminal compatibility we could first relax the above for the standard two-terminal setup.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Compatibility with transiesta multi-t...
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@tfrederiksen