You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have made a simple reproduction case with 100 functions, each used twice (to avoid inlining) and a single function which is used 100 times.
The function that is used over 100 times is assigned a longer name than a function that is only used twice, and thus wasting 98 bytes.
Describe the bug
I have made a simple reproduction case with 100 functions, each used twice (to avoid inlining) and a single function which is used 100 times.
The function that is used over 100 times is assigned a longer name than a function that is only used twice, and thus wasting 98 bytes.
Input code
Config
Playground link (or link to the minimal reproduction)
https://play.swc.rs/?version=1.10.18&code=H4sIAAAAAAAAA%2B3WzWoUURBA4b1PMUuFIN66v7XwSSQLTQxmkRmQhCDiu4vapyVw9iL0qqAWh%2F5m%2Bs6du6fzzeP95Xy6fXp4%2BPbu9ZvT9x%2Bv7l4siy3DltWWzZbdlsOW05bLlqkP7yQ1FUUVVRVlFXUVhRWVFaUVtYXawr8vtYXaQm2htlBbqC3UFmqraqtqq%2F4yqq2qraqtqq2qraqtqq2pramtqa35SVNbU1tTW1NbU1tTW1dbV1tXW1db958RtXW1dbV1tXW1DbUNtQ21DbUNtQ3%2FjVTbUNtQ21DbVNtU21TbVNtU21Tb9AtAbVNtU21LbUttS21LbUttS21LbctvN7UttaXaUm2ptlRbqi3VlmpLtaVf3Zvt%2Bf58e3l%2B%2B%2FH0%2FvThzx%2BSq%2B0C3GZss26zbbNvc2xzbnNtM%2BnsQYqFZKFZiBaqhWyhWwgXykE59melHJSDclAOykE5KAflSrlSrvvHQLlSrpQr5Uq5Uq6UG%2BVGuVFu%2BydMuVFulBvlRrlR7pQ75U65U%2B77l0e5U%2B6UO%2BVOeVAelAflQXlQHvt7QXlQHpQH5Ul5Up6UJ%2BVJeVKe%2BytHeVKelBflRXlRXpQX5UV5UV7720x5UU7KSTkpJ%2BWknJSTclLO%2FaDkNafw03EKj1N4nMJ%2FdQr%2FXpGXxy%2Bfv764IG9%2BHc3f66vTMY7xn43rn68mQh52EgAA&config=H4sIAAAAAAAAA52VwXKjMAyG732KDOce2sPu7PQB9rbP4HGwIM4ai7FkGqaTd68w0LKJyGEvmaBPQui3JH88HQ7Vmerq7fAhf%2BWht4kgfT2LhcbI9iKWCurOUp18z9XzSs80IU4ZiuU6g4ptaoFLEP1YvKuASCC2xgaCxdb56Jtxm6%2FGrk9AtLGJVd6XO4hMS7bnLUr4rtiPiAFsfECMJeMjQwtJ8aoxBNsTmMHquBOxPKGWYYKZwZk%2BYa%2Fy6Dx7jCLFPXVgnanRgYJ8gpr9AFqY5JKwSFLdvzJ%2FYwfH3LblhG%2BiYbAhW1ZywqUciHztPTuhJzZN1kSY2Y4CM9Sl9Y1JwDkp%2Bc7o407UXwApP1iiaLuiz60CxaORVtqHD0N9bKRdeVS49LZWZYRWJDXeN4qukzKQ2GtnmcDlGiZh632q60DegYGmkT7R6Lvn%2BqSl5LEHbBQgh2u175%2FtZm%2F%2BFjyNwj79LQWy2lmLQ2f5tAtp7I6oTdAaDHxCt8%2FlBBh3aZLFcOl3cY4OpB%2FAaR6ZNPs0nGwYTSjL8a4fZCTkhaYNeFQXQy%2FNXY7u9WUxXr82cWdjW%2BZ%2BszUZ%2BwADhP8flodUPniY2nsd8VsnD78Uq4gne%2FP1ZUVrJU%2Frb6mp6tDlTT2lPecL5Wf17bReH2t5lac%2Fa2C5la6fjTfCXuQGAAA%3D
SWC Info output
No response
Expected behavior
The
other
function at the bottom should receive a one-letter name.Actual behavior
It receives a two letter name. Receiving a one letter name would save 98 bytes in this extreme example.
Version
1.10.18
Additional context
If the function declaration of
other
is moved to the top of the file, it receives a one-letter name.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: