Proof of Concept Application for policy tracking
- CFS Policy Recommendations: 5 entries;
- A policy recommendation can be linked to many AE Principles
- AE Principles
- AE Principles can be linked to many CFS Policy Recommendations
- Priority Actions (23 suggested priority action areas)
- A CFS policy has many Priority Actions, and a priority action is linked to a single CFS Policy
Each country / political entity has an entry in the “countries” table.
A country has many “assessments”
- Each assessment has the following components:
- For each of the 24 priority actions:
- A general “status”;
- “Measures creating perverse incentives”
- “Measures that go beyond policy recommendations”
- “View from a Civil Society perspective”
- For each of the 24 priority actions:
A user can add any number of statements to each of the 4 x 24 components. Each statement has
- a free-text entry,
- the ability to add one or more pieces of “evidence”.
- Evidence = e.g.
- file uploads
- (text) references to policy documents. (e.g. “The Cattle Grazing Act (CAP 42)” )
- (text) other references.
- Probably, there should be a multi-upload for files, a free-text field, and a toggle or checkbox to state whether the evidence comes from official policy documents or other sources.
- Evidence = e.g.
- Statements can also be linked to 1 or more AE Principles.
is drafted, then marked as “ready for review” (i.e. finalised.), and the assessment is timestamped.
- After being marked as ‘ready for review’, any changes to the assessment must be made on a copy.
Our standard setup of inviting users to teams and or roles (to be added later)