You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since force moving is really associated with unilateral rights in application execution rules as well as turn taking, I would argue we should no longer use the term in the above ways -- the use of force move type behaviour is of course still supported but only at the choice of the application developer.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
For a while now we have used
challenge
in the API. But we still use the force move term in source code as well as theIForceMoveApp
https://docs.statechannels.org/protocol-tutorial/0020-execution-rules/#application-rules interface.Since force moving is really associated with unilateral rights in application execution rules as well as turn taking, I would argue we should no longer use the term in the above ways -- the use of force move type behaviour is of course still supported but only at the choice of the application developer.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions