Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review note[@type="footnote"] to ensure they are in the correct location in the data #1936

Open
wlpotter opened this issue Oct 4, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
data-normalization For use by General Editors only student For use by General Editors only

Comments

@wlpotter
Copy link
Contributor

wlpotter commented Oct 4, 2024

Not all of the note[@type="footnote"] elements got added or moved to the correct location. They should appear at the direct point in the data where the footnote would appear in the PDF. Sometimes, however, they got moved out to the general list of notes in the containing msItem element.

A review of these, comparing them to the PDF should be done to ensure they are in the correct location.

They can be found using the following find-in-files (ctrl/cmd+h):

  • Text to find: <note
  • Restrict to Xpath: note[@type="footnote"]
  • Scope: current file directory (with a manuscript record open)
@wlpotter wlpotter added data-normalization For use by General Editors only student For use by General Editors only labels Oct 4, 2024
@wlpotter wlpotter added this to the Version 1.0 Release milestone Oct 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
data-normalization For use by General Editors only student For use by General Editors only
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant