Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider adopting node async/sync naming convention for API methods #8

Open
amilajack opened this issue Nov 30, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Consider adopting node async/sync naming convention for API methods #8

amilajack opened this issue Nov 30, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@amilajack
Copy link
Member

If we consider giving developers access to sync API's we should do so using the *Sync convention. For example, if we have a method db.prepare() that is async, we should have a method called db.prepareSync(). This method will return a value instead of a value wrapped in a promise
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@amilajack