New license request: NFE-OSL-1.0 [SPDX-Online-Tools]

[TheNolle]

1. License Name: Nolly's Fair & Ethical Open-Source License (NFE-OSL v1.0)
2. Short identifier: NFE-OSL-1.0
3. License Author or steward: Nolly's Cafe (Nolly)
4. Comments: The NFE-OSL v1.0 license is an open-source, strong copyleft license derived from AGPL-3.0-or-later with additional ethical and fair-use protections. It ensures open-source freedom while preventing unfair commercial exploitation, unethical use, and lack of attribution. It aligns with SPDX’s principles by being clear, legally enforceable, and based on an OSI-approved license (AGPL-3.0).
5. License Request Url: http://tools.spdx.org/app/license_requests/432
6. URL(s): https://cafe.thenolle.com/nfe-osl
7. OSI Status: Not Submitted
8. Example Projects: https://github.com/nollyscafe/artbook, https://github.com/nollyscafe/nolly-cli, https://github.com/nollyscafe/cafe.thenolle.com, https://github.com/nollyscafe/nfe-osl

[karsten-klein]

{metæffekt} Universe
canonical name: GNU Affero General Public License 3.0
short name: AGPL-3.0
markers: Linked License Marker
category: AGPL
SPDX reference id: AGPL-3.0-only
ScanCode reference id: agpl-3.0
OSI status: approved
Open CoDE status: approved
Open CoDE approved license id: AGPL-3.0-only (SPDX)

canonical name: Nolly's Fair & Ethical Open-Source License 1.0
short name: NFE-OSL-1.0
markers: Linked License Marker
category: Nolly's Fair & Ethical Open-Source License
OSI status: none

Comment
None. I would like to understand whether such a "extension" of the AGPL is not implicitly in conflict with it. Compare section 7 of the AGPL:

All other non-permissive additional terms are considered "further restrictions" within the meaning of section 10. If the Program as you received it, or any part of it, contains a notice stating that it is governed by this License along with a term that is a further restriction, you may remove that term.