-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Visual logic is reversed #4
Comments
There sort of is a legend; the score panels have a tooltip that explains what the icons correspond to – flags, hits and misses. Flagging hundreds of fields would be very tedious, which should be a hint that it's not intended. I suppose one solution could be to use some other icon than a flag to mark cells, but I'm not sure what icon would represent a potential checkmark. A checkmark with a question sign maybe. |
I think changing the default checks would do the trick. |
Thanks, I like this idea, but it might be difficult to implement well, since the emojis look differently in different systems. Maybe instead of having them overlap, they could be in the opposite corners of the cell. |
If you don't read the text fully, from the visuals only you get the impression to flag all false fields, not all true ones.
The strictly equal fields are marked with a checkmark (good) which should be the opposite of a mine (bad).
So when those are no mines, surely all true fields are no mines, right? And thus you have to mark all other fields (the false ones) with a flag, because there is a mine under them.
The visuals for the results were also very confusing to me, and I think there should be a legend.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: