Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[QUERY] Ability to use built-in Lists workflow steps #329

Open
mcsescott opened this issue Jun 12, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

[QUERY] Ability to use built-in Lists workflow steps #329

mcsescott opened this issue Jun 12, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
feature request New feature or request

Comments

@mcsescott
Copy link

With the recent GA release of Slack Lists (yay!), I'd like to build some custom functions with Lists.

I do know that it will take a while for true Lists API methods to be released, but are there abilities for this Deno SDK to use the built-in Slack workflow steps (Add to List, Update a List, etc.) when building a coded workflow? I did a quick search in the code and didn't immediately see anything.

@srajiang srajiang added the feature request New feature or request label Jun 12, 2024
@srajiang
Copy link
Member

Hi @mcsescott - Yes, confirming that we do plan to add support for built-in Slack workflow steps to be able to be used in coded workflows.

@fieldju
Copy link

fieldju commented Sep 22, 2024

@srajiang is there any ETA on Slack Lists support in workflows?

@filmaj
Copy link
Contributor

filmaj commented Sep 25, 2024

Update here: I am working on getting these released! I am hitting some errors testing them in coded workflows, so I just want to make sure they work properly before releasing. Unless I hit an unexpected pitfall, these will be available in the upcoming deno-sdk release - soon!

@filmaj filmaj self-assigned this Sep 25, 2024
@filmaj filmaj removed their assignment Oct 8, 2024
@filmaj
Copy link
Contributor

filmaj commented Oct 8, 2024

Another update here: this has proved more challenging than expected. There are some workflow-builder assumptions built into these steps that will take more effort to tackle and make them generic enough for use in code. Plus, the steps don't seem very developer-centric as is: there is no 'create list' step, for example.

Will revisit in the future. Apologies for this. If you have strong feelings about the need for these steps in code, please let your voice be heard by emailing [email protected] and submitting that as a feature request.

@mcsescott
Copy link
Author

Thanks. I’ve found some workarounds for the things I am attempting to do.

Keep up the good fight!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature request New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants