Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Code for SF optimization suggestion #146

Open
Sergey-Litvinenko opened this issue Jan 15, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Code for SF optimization suggestion #146

Sergey-Litvinenko opened this issue Jan 15, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@Sergey-Litvinenko
Copy link

http://codeforsanfrancisco.org/projects/

Note: Title says - Our Projects, it is better if it's more descriptive:

<title>Code For San Francisco projects | current | past | ongoing</title>

or something of that nature that is human and machine readable and keyword reach.

Note:

Description is identical across all urls, it should be page specific. In this tag you usually describe your page as it will come up as url description in SERPs

Note: You list your project in a very chaotic manner. You should use "screen real estate" (visible part of the screen without scrolling) for the most important projects that you are proud of. Inactive projects should not be on this page at all. Also note that Adopt A Drain is not on that list.

Note: It is better to have project specific pages so a visitor stays on your website while getting more info on the project. (open to discussion, has to do with visitor retention and keeping link juice)

@jszwedko
Copy link
Member

@Sergey-Litvinenko I definitely agree, we should better utilize the page title and make it consistent. I'll take a pass at this.

There are some machinations in the works to revise the way the projects are presented, but I agree we should give this page a polishing. At the least, it does sort them from based on activity (most recent activity to least). I'll add AdoptADrain now while I'm thinking about it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants