You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In contrast to purely batch join, in stream processing the variety of join types is much broader. The main differences are:
streams have time ordering (as opposed to batch, where all elements have the same time)
streams can be windowed (as opposed to batch, where all elements belong to the same window)
This implies more options for joins besides the "classical" - left, right, inner, full outer:
join can either apply windowing on both streams or can cache left or right stream locally (windowed, leftCached, rightCached)
because of the time ordering the join can be performed in fashion of cartesian product of left and right elements having the same key, or only defined element from each set, yielding leftFirst, leftLast, leftAll, rightFirst, rightLast, rightAll
Of course, some combinations don't make sense, so we have to make the settings applicable only on meaningful combinations, which are:
{left, right, inner, full}, windowed, {left, right}{First, Last, All}
In contrast to purely batch join, in stream processing the variety of join types is much broader. The main differences are:
This implies more options for joins besides the "classical" - left, right, inner, full outer:
windowed
,leftCached
,rightCached
)leftFirst
,leftLast
,leftAll
,rightFirst
,rightLast
,rightAll
Of course, some combinations don't make sense, so we have to make the settings applicable only on meaningful combinations, which are:
The client code could look like this for classical windowed left join taking last element in each window
The following code will function as equivallent to joining
KStream
withKTable
in Kafka streams:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: