Skip to content

[ESSSANS] Direct beam: dealing with insufficient signal #717

Description

@SimonHeybrock

Based on chat with Judith about direct-beam iteration:

  • NaN-regions should probably be masked, or else we will get NaN in the workflow result. Should we mask the direct beam file, or should the reduction workflow perform its own masking?
  • Should NaN-regions be "filled" with approximate values based on non-NaN neighbours?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    esssansIssues for esssans.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions