Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MIPLIB Benchmark Case: b1c1s1 broken in [email protected] #299

Open
foreverdyz opened this issue Dec 28, 2024 · 7 comments
Open

MIPLIB Benchmark Case: b1c1s1 broken in [email protected] #299

foreverdyz opened this issue Dec 28, 2024 · 7 comments

Comments

@foreverdyz
Copy link

I used [email protected] to solve "b1c1s1" in MIPLIB and I set "parallel/maxnthread = 1", "limits/memory = 1024*16", and a time-limit as 3600s. I tried several times, and got following errors:

"""
L2635s| 3934 | 1337 | 10672k|2074.0 | gins| 74 |2624 |3715 |3602 |8674 | 1 | 313 |1920 | 2.029441e+04 | 2.533239e+04 | 24.82%| unknown
2657s| 4000 | 1377 | 10784k|2069.1 | 220M | 74 |2624 |3715 |3618 |9030 | 1 | 315 |1924 | 2.029504e+04 | 2.533239e+04 | 24.82%| unknown
2673s| 4100 | 1449 | 10868k|2045.2 | 221M | 74 |2624 |3717 |3639 |9468 | 1 | 318 |1931 | 2.029504e+04 | 2.533239e+04 | 24.82%| unknown
2689s| 4200 | 1479 | 10948k|2021.6 | 222M | 74 |2624 |3716 |3690 |9734 | 2 | 318 |1935 | 2.029583e+04 | 2.533239e+04 | 24.82%| unknown
2724s| 4300 | 1531 | 11102k|2012.5 | 224M | 74 |2624 |3723 |3653 | 10k| 2 | 326 |1937 | 2.030157e+04 | 2.533239e+04 | 24.78%| unknown
2744s| 4400 | 1597 | 11202k|1993.8 | 225M | 74 |2624 |3723 |3688 | 10k| 1 | 326 |1940 | 2.030299e+04 | 2.533239e+04 | 24.77%| unknown
2758s| 4500 | 1653 | 11265k|1969.3 | 226M | 74 |2624 |3724 |3688 | 11k| 0 | 328 |1942 | 2.030999e+04 | 2.533239e+04 | 24.73%| unknown
2782s| 4600 | 1687 | 11368k|1952.6 | 227M | 74 |2624 |3723 |3713 | 11k| 0 | 328 |1946 | 2.031948e+04 | 2.533239e+04 | 24.67%| unknown
2821s| 4700 | 1725 | 11533k|1947.4 | 228M | 74 |2624 |3723 |3685 | 11k| 2 | 330 |1951 | 2.033211e+04 | 2.533239e+04 | 24.59%| unknown
time | node | left |LP iter|LP it/n|mem/heur|mdpt |vars |cons |rows |cuts |sepa|confs|strbr| dualbound | primalbound | gap | compl.
2838s| 4800 | 1755 | 11603k|1926.1 | 228M | 74 |2624 |3726 |3685 | 11k| 0 | 333 |1956 | 2.033508e+04 | 2.533239e+04 | 24.57%| unknown
ERROR: LoadError: StackOverflowError:
Stacktrace:
[1] SCIPsolve
@ ~/.julia/packages/SCIP/Dt026/src/LibSCIP.jl:18659 [inlined]
[2] macro expansion
@ ~/.julia/packages/SCIP/Dt026/src/wrapper.jl:16 [inlined]
[3] optimize!(o::SCIP.Optimizer)
@ SCIP ~/.julia/packages/SCIP/Dt026/src/MOI_wrapper.jl:404
[4] optimize!(model::Model; ignore_optimize_hook::Bool, _differentiation_backend::MathOptInterface.Nonlinear.SparseReverseMode, kwargs::@kwargs{})
@ JuMP ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/i68GU/src/optimizer_interface.jl:595
[5] optimize!(model::Model)
@ JuMP ~/.julia/packages/JuMP/i68GU/src/optimizer_interface.jl:546
[6] top-level scope
@ ~/papercode/solve_models.jl:36
"""

Could you help me figure out what is happening or how to fix that?

@matbesancon
Copy link
Member

matbesancon commented Dec 28, 2024 via email

@foreverdyz
Copy link
Author

Hi, I just ] add SCIP in a linux. The version of SCIP_PAPILO_jll is v900.200.0+0. Thank you

@matbesancon
Copy link
Member

matbesancon commented Dec 28, 2024 via email

@foreverdyz
Copy link
Author

foreverdyz commented Dec 29, 2024

Thank you. I downgraded SCIP.jl to v0.11.14 (SCIP_PAPILO_jll automatically downgraded to v800.100.0+0) and the problem was solved.

By the way, I may need to wait for an update of the C solver of SCIP if I want to use the newest SCIP in Julia, right?

@matbesancon
Copy link
Member

By the way, I may need to wait for an update of the C solver of SCIP if I want to use the newest SCIP in Julia, right?

You can use the solver binary you'd like, you need to specify it through an environment variable at build time of SCIP.jl (there are steps in the readme)

Does that answer your question?

@foreverdyz
Copy link
Author

Yes, thank you!

@matbesancon
Copy link
Member

hi! I couldn't reproduce the problem when trying to run the instance through SCIP.jl, it's long but I went further in the progress (21.86% in gap)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants