Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question on RSSI impact on accuracy? #199

Open
IoTThinks opened this issue Jun 23, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Question on RSSI impact on accuracy? #199

IoTThinks opened this issue Jun 23, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@IoTThinks
Copy link

IoTThinks commented Jun 23, 2020

Hi all,
Thanks for the awesome project.
I understand that the RSSI will be taken into consideration for machine learning.

In this URL https://www.internalpositioning.com/doc/faq.md#minimum, it is mentioned that the graphs are "similar". And "This indicates that these two places are probably too close together."

For a layman, these graphs are actually not similar to me.
They are similar with the same detected access points (SSID / BSSID)
However, the RSSI and power are different?

Hence, in this case, the system "should" differentiate the locations of the two graphs, right?
Any advice is appreciated.
Thanks a lot.

image

@schollz
Copy link
Owner

schollz commented Jul 15, 2020

Those two graphs are pretty similar. Yellow, red and blue are all overlapping the same regions with small shifts. Only green is very different, but not by much.

@IoTThinks
Copy link
Author

IoTThinks commented Jul 16, 2020

@schollz Yes, you are right. If we only consider the X-axis then yellow, red and blue are quite the same in two graphs.

BTW what is the unit of the Y-axis?
The values of Y-axis are different.
Hence, the "shapes" in two graphs are different.
Except the yellow graph, the rest have different shape in two graphs.

Thanks a lot for replying me. :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants