-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add other package updaters/modularize #4
Comments
Hi, thanks for the feedback. If An alternative approach might be to support something like an Would something like that suffice for your use case? If so, I can look at adding it. Best, sakaki |
Addresses issues: * https://github.com/sakaki-/genup/issues/4 * https://github.com/sakaki-/genup/issues/5 Thanks to ngerstle, iperi for requesting.
Underlying adds support for custom updaters (via /etc/genup/updaters.d), and ebuild installs a few simple examples. Addresses: *) https://github.com/sakaki-/genup/issues/4 and *) https://github.com/sakaki-/genup/issues/5; thanks to ngerstle and iperi for suggesting.
Hi, I've just released I'm very open to pull requests for more sophisticated handlers to place in the |
Looks great to me- thanks for the update! |
Assuming this is working OK now so closing - please re-open if you experience problems. |
Currently,
genup
syncs and updates the portage tree, overlays, and packages, rebuilds modules, and then explicitly updates perl and python modules usingperl-cleaner
andpython-updater
.Other languages/environments maintain their own updaters-
haskell-updater
is the one giving rise to this issue.I'll see if I can get around to throwing together a pull request for adding a call to
haskell-updater
in the script, but is that the correct approach to take?Can/should the addition of other package management tools be incorporated in a more coherent fashion?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: