From 4abea11f31d970f8ba913c706abf26f4d8ea9069 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Li Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 15:29:22 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Scoring: Use N/A for recommended/optional, 0 is only a failure for Mandatory --- docs/source/evaluation.md | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/source/evaluation.md b/docs/source/evaluation.md index 285befd9..112d1d07 100644 --- a/docs/source/evaluation.md +++ b/docs/source/evaluation.md @@ -37,9 +37,10 @@ For more info see: {ref}`is_standard` You should score your TRE against each statement in the SATRE specification using this scoring system: -:0 Not met: The TRE does not meet this requirement (the TRE is not SATRE compliant) +:0 Not met: The TRE does not meet this requirement (if this is **Mandatory** this means the TRE is not SATRE compliant) :1 Sufficient: The TRE meets this requirement met but there is substantial scope for improvement :2 Satisfied: The TRE meets this requirement met but there may still be scope for improvement +:N/A: Not applicable: The statement is not relevant to a TRE, may apply to **Recommended** or **Optional** statements A score of **1** or above means you have met the requirement. Optionally you can use **1** and **2** to indicate potential areas of improvement in your TRE.