Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 30, 2019. It is now read-only.

Commit fda3fbd

Browse files
Bastian Gruberyoshuawuyts
authored andcommitted
Add meeting notes for 2019-04-11 (#107)
1 parent 81e1ee0 commit fda3fbd

File tree

1 file changed

+40
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+40
-0
lines changed

meetings/2019-04-11.md

Lines changed: 40 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
1+
2+
## Six-Week Sprint
3+
- End date: 2019-05-02 (six weeks)
4+
- [Sprint goals](https://github.com/rustasync/team/blob/master/rfcs/0001-tide-roadmap.md)
5+
- Since the big revamp PR landed, people can pick up issues and working on them
6+
- Even if the async book is currently blocked, outlining chapters is helpful to bring book in a rough shape
7+
- Discussions around standardized middleware interface, work queues and non HTTP based protocols need to happen
8+
- Discussions around those topics should happen under the according issue to be able to track the progress
9+
- This sprint is more focused on “insiders”. Starting next sprint the goal is to bring more maintainers in
10+
11+
## Working Group Updates
12+
- Status updates
13+
- tide
14+
- The big [revamp](https://github.com/rustasync/tide/pull/156) is finally merged which makes the code easier to understand
15+
- @Aaron T cleaned up old issues; the current list is now be able to get worked on
16+
- The core is probably in a final state so it’s worth considering creating a new release and publishing a blog post
17+
- It’s also a great opportunity go get new people on board
18+
- Before that there still needs to be work done to make it more welcoming for newcomers to contribute
19+
- The open [RFC](https://github.com/rustasync/tide/issues/162) is going in this direction
20+
- How to handle “core”/ecosystem split, and Tide releases (see this [RFC](https://github.com/rustasync/tide/issues/162))
21+
- The idea is to bring crates into a tide-x namespace once they gained mass adoption to support them “officially”
22+
- Outlining a process helps for communication and to have a guideline
23+
- Another idea is to create a middleware interface which could work across frameworks
24+
- The deadline should be by the end of this sprint, to get people on board and momentum going
25+
- Planning to bump the version to 0.1.0 (without a big announcement) so people can play around with the changes
26+
- Start formalizing a set of core maintainers to remove blockers in the future
27+
- futures
28+
- Lots of progress is being made lately ([issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/59725))
29+
- Should be ready for stabilization in Rust 1.36 (in 6 weeks)
30+
- The Future crate is currently broken on nightly due to API changes (`&Waker``&mut Context<``'``_>` ([PR](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/59119))
31+
- romio + juliex
32+
- Open [PR](https://github.com/withoutboats/juliex/pull/13) removes double boxing
33+
- Another open [PR](https://github.com/withoutboats/romio/pull/83) is adjusting to upcoming futures-preview changes
34+
- async rust book
35+
- nothing happened around this topic last week (due to futures stabilization)
36+
- Outlining chapters to figure out how the book will look like
37+
- arewewebyet
38+
- Content updates were being made
39+
- Issue triage ([org](https://github.com/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+archived%3Afalse+user%3Arustasync) | [tide](https://github.com/rustasync/tide/issues/))
40+
- @Aaron T cleaned up a few issues so everything open should be able to get worked on

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)