Skip to content

is multiple comparison correction relevant for searchlights #22

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
bpinsard opened this issue Jun 29, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

is multiple comparison correction relevant for searchlights #22

bpinsard opened this issue Jun 29, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@bpinsard
Copy link

Hi, this is not really an "issue".

I am interested by "crossnobis" searchlight technique that I have seen applied in few paper but I am concerned about multiple multivariate testing (same voxel used in multiple searchlights).
Having let say one distance map (one pair distance or averages of pairs distance) per subject and performing a 1-sample t-test vs. 0 , is it necessary to perform multiple comparison correction or the cross-validated unbiased distance is enough?
One option would be to run some sort of fsl randomize for non-parametric testing: repeated sign permutations of distance with 1-sample t-test to create voxelwise t-distribution for thresholding followed by cluster size correction.
lmnwyt

Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant