-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[feature] WorkerPool with different configuration for queues #2090
Comments
Potential CLI: Internal structure can be |
@selwin will you accept a PR for something like this? |
@ankush sorry, I just saw this message. Sorry, but I don't think this will get into the RQ core. But if you want, we can rework or improve RQ's internal implementation to provide hooks that you may require so you can implement it more easily in a separate script or package. I'm closing this issue for now, please reopen if you want to propose some changes to how |
Right now we can provide fix list of queues for WorkerPool.
So if I have two queues but I want dedicated set of workers for one of the queue then I need to run a separate pool. This reduces benefit we can get from shared memory in pool.
Possible solution:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: