You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This idea was in response to a comment made by @hollybik when reviewing the F1000 taxa paper:
How does "taxa" deal with (or allow manipulation / correction of) taxonomic hierarchies with non-homologous taxonomic levels. For example, a set of input hierarchies where level 4 represents "Order" level in Fungi but "Subclass" level in protists. This is a very common scenario for metabarcoding datasets - ideally you want to introduce gaps/placeholders for hierarchies that do not contain a certain level, so that users can automatically or manually standardize their taxonomic levels all rows in a dataset (e.g. making Level 7 correspond to "Family" level across all taxa).
It would also be useful as an intermediate step when converting the taxonomy information in a taxmap or taxonomy object into a table with ranks as columns.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This idea was in response to a comment made by @hollybik when reviewing the F1000 taxa paper:
It would also be useful as an intermediate step when converting the taxonomy information in a
taxmap
ortaxonomy
object into a table with ranks as columns.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: