Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 1, 2024. It is now read-only.

Rocky Cloud Images page is missing date and type/variant fields #492

Open
neirbowj opened this issue Feb 24, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Rocky Cloud Images page is missing date and type/variant fields #492

neirbowj opened this issue Feb 24, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@neirbowj
Copy link

Description

Any attribute which serves to differentiate one AMI from another should be exposed on the Cloud Images page. Evidently, the image build date and an attribute which appears to be some kind of type or variant designation are such attributes which are not displayed as columns in the results table nor available as filtering criteria.

Screenshots

cloud-images-91-x86_64_us-east-2

console-ec2-ami-search

Files

Not evident from the submitter's perspective.

To Reproduce

  1. Visit the Cloud Images page
  2. Apply all available filters (e.g. OS Version = 9.1, Provider = AWS, Region = us-east-2, Architecture = x86_64
  3. Attempt to discern the differences among the multiple resulting AMI IDs
@neirbowj
Copy link
Author

To be clear, I don't think it is necessary for the date and variant attributes to be available as filter criteria. Exposing that information in the results table would be sufficient.

@tcooper
Copy link
Member

tcooper commented Feb 24, 2023

Required to fix...

  1. add AMI name to cloud-images.json,
  2. update cloud-images.js adding column for AMI name field.

Ideally the tooling that generates cloud-images.json should be modified to sort the output (eg. jq 'sort_by(.version, .provider, .region, .architecture )' <input >cloud-images.json) to minimize the diff created on future updates.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants