You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 1, 2024. It is now read-only.
Any attribute which serves to differentiate one AMI from another should be exposed on the Cloud Images page. Evidently, the image build date and an attribute which appears to be some kind of type or variant designation are such attributes which are not displayed as columns in the results table nor available as filtering criteria.
To be clear, I don't think it is necessary for the date and variant attributes to be available as filter criteria. Exposing that information in the results table would be sufficient.
Ideally the tooling that generates cloud-images.json should be modified to sort the output (eg. jq 'sort_by(.version, .provider, .region, .architecture )' <input >cloud-images.json) to minimize the diff created on future updates.
Description
Any attribute which serves to differentiate one AMI from another should be exposed on the Cloud Images page. Evidently, the image build date and an attribute which appears to be some kind of type or variant designation are such attributes which are not displayed as columns in the results table nor available as filtering criteria.
Screenshots
Files
Not evident from the submitter's perspective.
To Reproduce
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: