You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, Kan. I read your paper, admire and find it promising of this model without distribution assumption. Here is two questions I have to expect your answer:
For the Equation(6), should the subscript of b be l instead of l-1? I found in your presentation on KKD the subscript had been corrected.
For the lose part of the 2nd loss L_lose in Equation(12), should the range of l in SUM be [0, index of bidding price]? In the previous equations the paper said "where li is the interval index of the true market price zi ∈Vli given the feature vector xi", however, the market price is censored in losing bids and li could not be acquired. In which way, I expect the range to be different from previous though they used the same notation here.
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, Kan. I read your paper, admire and find it promising of this model without distribution assumption. Here is two questions I have to expect your answer:
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: