You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have a big cluster (over 20 nodes) and when some changes is apply by the automation, many events occurring in very short time and it is hard to decide, which was origin order, because the exporter support only second precision.
This is example from my small test cluster:
Here you can see 6 events, which occurred in same seconds, but I am not sure, that in this order.
In payload (in the field @timestamp) I really not see more, like seconds precision:
In bigger clusters in some hot situation events can occurring hundred of kubernetes events in very short time, which can be missordered due to only seconds precision (setting .GetTimestampISO8601).
I would like to kindly ask you to expand the exporter and support full precision. So, field @timestamp should looks like 2024-05-21T07:39:59.348738261Z (for example, setting can be GetTimestampISO8601_ns or something like this).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi there.
We have a big cluster (over 20 nodes) and when some changes is apply by the automation, many events occurring in very short time and it is hard to decide, which was origin order, because the exporter support only second precision.
This is example from my small test cluster:
Here you can see 6 events, which occurred in same seconds, but I am not sure, that in this order.
In payload (in the field
@timestamp
) I really not see more, like seconds precision:In bigger clusters in some hot situation events can occurring hundred of kubernetes events in very short time, which can be missordered due to only seconds precision (setting
.GetTimestampISO8601
).I would like to kindly ask you to expand the exporter and support full precision. So, field
@timestamp
should looks like2024-05-21T07:39:59.348738261Z
(for example, setting can beGetTimestampISO8601_ns
or something like this).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: