Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Do we need different stages of compatibility (e.g. support for variables)? #32

Open
bergos opened this issue Feb 4, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

Do we need different stages of compatibility (e.g. support for variables)? #32

bergos opened this issue Feb 4, 2016 · 2 comments
Labels
design
Milestone
data-model-spec

Comments

@bergos
Copy link
Member

bergos commented Feb 4, 2016

Variable support is optional. Can we just say variables are not supported if the constructor is undefined?
@elf-pavlik
Copy link
Member

elf-pavlik commented Mar 10, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Maybe we should mention that implementation not supporting Variable (eg. all RDF1.1 serializes) MAY/SHOULD/MUST throw error if they encounter it?
https://gitter.im/rdfjs/Representation-Task-Force?at=58c22b991465c46a560ff842

@elf-pavlik elf-pavlik added this to the data-model-spec milestone Feb 7, 2019
@elf-pavlik
Copy link
Member

Looking at reference implementation: https://github.com/rdfjs/data-model/blob/master/lib/variable.js

Do we really need factories which don't implement DataFactory.variable() ?

We could just remove This method is optional. from the spec.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
design
Projects
None yet
Milestone
data-model-spec
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@l00mi @bergos @RubenVerborgh @elf-pavlik