You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When a tail-loss probe needs to be sent the current queue_probe algorithm adds a PING frame even if a DATAGRAM frame could also be sent. This wastes a single byte, potentially amplified by being the start of a GSO batch.
This isn't that bad, there are many cases in which the user datagram would not fit into the probe packet anyway. Still, it could be a nice small improvement.
When a tail-loss probe needs to be sent the current
queue_probe
algorithm adds a PING frame even if a DATAGRAM frame could also be sent. This wastes a single byte, potentially amplified by being the start of a GSO batch.This isn't that bad, there are many cases in which the user datagram would not fit into the probe packet anyway. Still, it could be a nice small improvement.
See #2169 which tried to solve this before, but probably broke some edge cases: https://github.com/quinn-rs/quinn/pull/2169/files#r1987103861
See #2172 which reverts this part of #2169 again.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: