Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add more considerations for server processes/threads. #231

Open
martinduke opened this issue Feb 11, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #232
Open

Add more considerations for server processes/threads. #231

martinduke opened this issue Feb 11, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #232

Comments

@martinduke
Copy link
Contributor

In Sec 6.2

  • First, replace "processes" with "processes or threads".

  • Second, the secure hash method really needs to have the thread ID appended to the server ID. Otherwise, different processes/threads will generate the same cipher text.
@martinduke martinduke changed the title Add more onsiderations for server processes/threads. Add more considerations for server processes/threads. Feb 11, 2025
@martinduke martinduke linked a pull request Feb 11, 2025 that will close this issue
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Considerations for Server Processes/Threads quicwg/load-balancers
1 participant
@martinduke