Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

safety is pulling in jinja2 with a vulnerability and failing the safety check #539

Open
hangonlyra opened this issue Jun 17, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@hangonlyra
Copy link

  • safety version: 3.2.3
  • Python version: 3.11
  • Operating System:

Description

When I install safety and run the check, it fails on jinja2 vulnerability. My application doesn't use jinja2. It's a dependency of safety.

What I Did

python3 -m pip install safety
 safety check -i 54318 -i 62044 -i 64396 -i 64459 -i 65213 -i 67599

Console output

#17 38.44 + python3 -m pip install safety
#17 39.25 Looking in indexes: <REDACTED>
#17 39.52 Collecting safety
#17 39.65   Downloading https://<REDACTED>/repository/pypi-all/packages/safety/3.2.3/safety-3.2.3-py3-none-any.whl (146 kB)
#17 39.66      ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 146.7/146.7 kB 22.7 MB/s eta 0:00:00
#17 39.68 Requirement already satisfied: setuptools>=65.5.1 in ./build_env/lib/python3.11/site-packages (from safety) (70.0.0)
#17 39.68 Requirement already satisfied: Click>=8.0.2 in ./build_env/lib/python3.11/site-packages (from safety) (8.1.7)
#17 39.68 Requirement already satisfied: urllib3>=1.26.5 in ./build_env/lib/python3.11/site-packages (from safety) (1.26.18)
#17 39.97 Collecting requests (from safety)
#17 40.04   Downloading https://<REDACTED>/repository/pypi-all/packages/requests/2.32.3/requests-2.32.3-py3-none-any.whl (64 kB)
#17 40.05      ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 64.9/64.9 kB 11.3 MB/s eta 0:00:00
#17 40.05 Requirement already satisfied: packaging>=21.0 in ./build_env/lib/python3.11/site-packages (from safety) (24.1)
#17 40.22 Collecting dparse>=0.6.4b0 (from safety)
#17 40.29   Downloading https://<REDACTED>/repository/pypi-all/packages/dparse/0.6.4b0/dparse-0.6.4b0-py3-none-any.whl (11 kB)
#17 40.93 Collecting ruamel.yaml>=0.17.21 (from safety)
#17 41.07   Downloading https://<REDACTED>/repository/pypi-all/packages/ruamel-yaml/0.18.6/ruamel.yaml-0.18.6-py3-none-any.whl (117 kB)
#17 41.07      ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 117.8/117.8 kB 21.8 MB/s eta 0:00:00
#17 41.31 Collecting jinja2>=3.1.0 (from safety)
#17 41.50   Downloading https://<REDACTED>/repository/pypi-all/packages/jinja2/3.1.4/jinja2-3.1.4-py3-none-any.whl (133 kB)
<TRUNCATED>
#17 52.14 + safety check -i 54318 -i 62044 -i 64396 -i 64459 -i 65213 -i 67599
#17 56.67 -> Vulnerability found in jinja2 version 3.1.4
#17 56.67    Vulnerability ID: 70612
#17 56.67    Affected spec: >=0
#17 56.67    ADVISORY: In Jinja2, the from_string function is prone to Server
#17 56.67    Side Template Injection (SSTI) where it takes the "source" parameter as...
#17 56.67    Fixed versions: No known fix
#17 56.67    CVE-2019-8341 is CRITICAL SEVERITY => CVSS v3, BASE
#17 56.67    SCORE 9.8
#17 56.67    For more information about this vulnerability, visit
#17 56.67    https://data.safetycli.com/v/70612/eda
#17 56.67    To ignore this vulnerability, use PyUp vulnerability id 70612 in safety's
#17 56.67    ignore command-line argument or add the ignore to your safety policy file.
@romanzdk
Copy link

We are facing the same issue :(

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants