Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request to use Azure Container Apps (ACA) in place of Azure Container Instances (ACI) for Azure container templates #669

Open
Megasware128 opened this issue Oct 19, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
area/templates kind/enhancement Improvements or new features

Comments

@Megasware128
Copy link

Hello!

  • Vote on this issue by adding a 馃憤 reaction
  • If you want to implement this feature, comment to let us know (we'll work with you on design, scheduling, etc.)

Issue details

Affected area/feature

Azure container templates (csharp, go etc...)

Feature description

Given the advantages of ACA over ACI, it's beneficial to update the Azure container template to use ACA instead of ACI. ACA is more suited for hosting web apps due to its user-centric features and automatic scaling, while ACI is designed for burst-type workloads and lacks built-in support for web app-centric features such as scaling, load balancing, and certificate management.

Why is this important?

This change is crucial as it aligns the Azure container template with a service (ACA) that is better suited for hosting web apps. It provides a more user-friendly, cost-effective, and scalable solution compared to ACI, which is designed for burst-type workloads. Transitioning to ACA will enhance user experience and efficiency for projects that require web app hosting inside of containers on Azure.

@Megasware128 Megasware128 added kind/enhancement Improvements or new features needs-triage Needs attention from the triage team labels Oct 19, 2023
@scottslowe scottslowe added area/templates and removed needs-triage Needs attention from the triage team labels Oct 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/templates kind/enhancement Improvements or new features
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants