Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider moving bedrockagent resources #3907

Open
t0yv0 opened this issue May 8, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Consider moving bedrockagent resources #3907

t0yv0 opened this issue May 8, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
kind/enhancement Improvements or new features

Comments

@t0yv0
Copy link
Member

t0yv0 commented May 8, 2024

These resources are under bedrockagent upstream, which is separate from bedrock. Consider using a dedicated module for bedrockagent.

If not doing this, we have the unfortunate problem of aws_bedrockagent_agent_knowledge_base_association mapping to bedrock/agentAgentKnowledgeBaseAssociation.AgentAgentKnowledgeBaseAssociation which is affecting the generated code names and is confusing and not user-friendly.

Affected:

  - aws_bedrockagent_agent_knowledge_base_association
  - aws_bedrockagent_agent_alias
  - aws_bedrockagent_agent_action_group
  - aws_bedrockagent_agent
  - aws_bedrockagent_knowledge_base
@t0yv0
Copy link
Member Author

t0yv0 commented May 8, 2024

There are some issues in the bridge pulumi/pulumi-terraform-bridge#1937 that make the move less trivial than would be ideal, should fix those first.

@mikhailshilkov mikhailshilkov added the kind/enhancement Improvements or new features label May 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/enhancement Improvements or new features
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants