You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It will be easier to create accurate citations in Orangelight, without additional processing / regex-ing, if we store each publication field separately, since different citation formats require different presentation of this information.
Level of urgency
High
Moderate
Low
Why is this maintenance needed?
To create accurate citations in Orangelight without needing the full Marc record for all items.
Acceptance criteria
If this change touches any of the files referenced in .rubocop_todo.yml create a new ticket to address the rubocop todo.
Store publication place in Solr as publication_location_citation_display
Store publisher in Solr as publisher_citation_display
Store date of publication in Solr as publication_date_citation_display
Implementation notes, if any
the *_display ending will put the fields in Solr correctly
the dates from the 008 field are sometimes 9999, which is not appropriate for citations. Follow how the date is gotten for pub_created_display
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What maintenance needs to be done?
It will be easier to create accurate citations in Orangelight, without additional processing / regex-ing, if we store each publication field separately, since different citation formats require different presentation of this information.
Level of urgency
Why is this maintenance needed?
Acceptance criteria
.rubocop_todo.yml
create a new ticket to address the rubocop todo.publication_location_citation_display
publisher_citation_display
publication_date_citation_display
Implementation notes, if any
*_display
ending will put the fields in Solr correctlypub_created_display
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: