Skip to content

Volume coupling and nearest projection mapping do not integrate well and are untested #162

@BenjaminRodenberg

Description

@BenjaminRodenberg

The issue precice/tutorials#374 basically originates from a bad integration of volume coupling into the overall code and a lack of testing. I decided to comment out the corresponding code to keep the existing surface coupling features working.

Todos

  • We need some tests that ensure that volume coupling and surface coupling with nearest projection mapping don't conflict
  • We need a proper integration of both features
  • Add channel-transport-reaction as a pure FEniCS case to our tests

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    bugSomething isn't working

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions