-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 103
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for AsyncIterators
#378
Labels
Comments
This issue has been marked as stale because it has been opened 30 days without activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days. |
This issue was closed because it has been stalled for 5 days with no activity. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
After seeing the following comment from @JoshuaWise: #108 (comment)
I started wondering if adding support for
AsyncIterators
might be a good addition. But somehow I feel it might break the pillars behind Piscina, as each thread communicates back anIterator
and that might cause some harm over the whole pool (not to mention possible leakages).Wanted to drag some chat about it and maybe start thinking about its pros and cons.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: