Why does this abstract to GTK rather than Qt? #2371
-
|
Surely Qt, because it supports so many more platforms, is the superior choice? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
|
There was/is no good Qt bindings for .NET afaik. I'd welcome someone contributing a Qt platform but it certainly isn't a priority. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yeah, @cwensley, that's what I found online too. In fact, I barely found any decent .NET interfaces. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@cwensley, have you seen https://github.com/qt-labs/qtdotnet/blob/251910aacf46f2c97c7d7f80adabd47d8d23b819/README.md#qt--net? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
There was/is no good Qt bindings for .NET afaik. I'd welcome someone contributing a Qt platform but it certainly isn't a priority.