-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 239
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Completely dismantle Actions-based tests except for combinatorics #1797
Labels
Comments
act exists but word on the block is it kinda sucks. I'm guessing it has the problem of not actually being the same as the runner. It doesn't even seem to fully support the GHA yamlscript. |
Have you considered the way bevy went? It allows to run the exactly same thing both in the CI and locally: https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/tree/release-0.14.2/tools/ci. |
@YohDeadfall That's basically my intention, yes. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
There are sets of tests that we have that should just be entered by a single command, like the tests for the individual "example extensions". They make fixing problems with them extremely slow because like fuck is anyone going to set up the actions runner on their desktop just to be able to run local testing, and thus everyone who contributes to pgrx, including myself, is averse to refactoring them.
related:
pgrx-examples
into a more "normal" examples directory? #1554The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: