You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There is no "HASH" keyword in the "ALTER DISTRIBUTION" command definition. Therefore, when using a key-range-based approach, we use the int64 golang type, but when using a hash-based approach, the underlying type becomes uint32, which leads to confusion.
What should we do?
Update or documentation
Introduce new uint type (should be the underlying type uint32 or uint64?)
Forbid using int type for hash-based approach
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There is no "HASH" keyword in the "ALTER DISTRIBUTION" command definition. Therefore, when using a key-range-based approach, we use the int64 golang type, but when using a hash-based approach, the underlying type becomes uint32, which leads to confusion.
What should we do?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: