You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now a large number of possibilities exist to initialize axes, in term of nature (list, numpy arrays, Axis instances) and methods to pass them as argument (as a sequence of axes, or in the 1-D case just the one axis). This is all fine and handy, but is more error prone, as an axis as a list of elements, and a list of axes look pretty similar at first sight, programmatically (need to look at content to distinguish them). Introduce a few more checks and error messages, so that at least obvious errors can be treated, e.g. issue #35.
And possibly, sacrifice a few options for the sake of clarity.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right now a large number of possibilities exist to initialize axes, in term of nature (list, numpy arrays, Axis instances) and methods to pass them as argument (as a sequence of axes, or in the 1-D case just the one axis). This is all fine and handy, but is more error prone, as an axis as a list of elements, and a list of axes look pretty similar at first sight, programmatically (need to look at content to distinguish them). Introduce a few more checks and error messages, so that at least obvious errors can be treated, e.g. issue #35.
And possibly, sacrifice a few options for the sake of clarity.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: