Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Custom bounds on the blockade radius #94

Open
HGSilveri opened this issue Mar 1, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Custom bounds on the blockade radius #94

HGSilveri opened this issue Mar 1, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
archive Smthg to keep in mind, but not worth implementing now enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@HGSilveri
Copy link
Collaborator

From my point of view, the user's access to the Rydberg blockade radius is still a little rough. It's strange to start with the register and then not really knowing whether your chosen pulse amplitudes actually give you the connectivity you're hoping for. I though it could be useful to have the option of setting the upper and/or lower bound of the blockade radius.

This would amount to translating the given blockade radius bounds to maximum Rabi frequency values and then filtering the pulses added to Rydberg channels to ensure this requirement is met. I have a feeling this might be a bit too restrictive and that perhaps one might not want all pulses in the Rydberg channels to obey these bounds, in which case the user would have to relax or give up on setting them altogether. For now, this is just an idea, the precise implementation might change.

@lhenriet @sebgrijalva I'm curious to hear your thoughts on this.

@HGSilveri HGSilveri added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 1, 2021
@HGSilveri
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Update: The above requirement is indeed too restrictive. A very minimal, but useful addition, would be to plot a line marking the \Omega threshold that enforces a given blockade radius minimum or maximum value.

@lhenriet lhenriet added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Apr 11, 2021
@a-corni a-corni added the archive Smthg to keep in mind, but not worth implementing now label Sep 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
archive Smthg to keep in mind, but not worth implementing now enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants