You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In particular, this query has an interpretation: we are basically searching for sentences where a dog is being chased.
Even though the SPARQL resulting from it makes sense and we get the right results, there is a highlighting problem. .
In this case, it's easy to see that the match happened associating WQL's z variable with the MRS x3 variable, and the corresponding MRS variable is highlighted but only in the predication with _dog_n_1.
Actually, if we look at the SPARQL resulting query, we have
The problem is that we are selecting the SPARQL variable ?x5 two times and the second occurence was ignored on the output.
I should investigate whether this problem only occur with AllegroGraph or it's about SPARQL specification and how to solve it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The WQL query
In particular, this query has an interpretation: we are basically searching for sentences where a dog is being chased.
.
Even though the SPARQL resulting from it makes sense and we get the right results, there is a highlighting problem.
In this case, it's easy to see that the match happened associating WQL's
z
variable with the MRSx3
variable, and the corresponding MRS variable is highlighted but only in the predication with_dog_n_1
.Actually, if we look at the SPARQL resulting query, we have

The problem is that we are selecting the SPARQL variable
?x5
two times and the second occurence was ignored on the output.I should investigate whether this problem only occur with AllegroGraph or it's about SPARQL specification and how to solve it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: