Different categories of repeats by using different version of EDTA

[Luxet]

Hi Shujun,

Thank you for producing this tool! I have a question about the results of *.sum file.
I wanted to compare my results with those in previous studies. We both used EDTA to annotate the repeats, but with different version.
In previous study, they used EDTA v1.8.5, however, I used v2.0.1
The results of sum file is different.
By checking other studies, I wonder if I could interpret the results like this?

v1.8.5 results | v2.0.1 results
DNA/DTT+ MITE/DTT == Tc1 Mariner;
DNA/DTA + MITE/DTA == hAT;
DNA/DTM + MITE/DTM == Mutator;
DNA/DTH + MITE/DTH == PIF_Harbinger;
DNA/DTC + MITE/DTC == CACTA;

Best,

Luxet

[oushujun]

Yes you are correct. I merged the MITEs into TIRs at some point. Overall they are from the same autonomous elements with different lengths. Shujun

…

On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 2:31 AM Luxet ***@***.***> wrote: Hi Shujun, Thank you for producing this tool! I have a question about the results of *.sum file. I wanted to compare my results with those in previous studies. We both used EDTA to annotate the repeats, but with different version. In previous study, they used EDTA v1.8.5, however, I used v2.0.1 The results of sum file is different. By checking other studies, I wonder if I could interpret the results like this? v1.8.5 results | v2.0.1 results DNA/DTT+ MITE/DTT == Tc1 Mariner; DNA/DTA + MITE/DTA == hAT; DNA/DTM + MITE/DTM == Mutator; DNA/DTH + MITE/DTH == PIF_Harbinger; DNA/DTC + MITE/DTC == CACTA; Best, Luxet — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#538>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABNX4NCZWD3UA4UXCSYCMED2LSQ6NAVCNFSM6AAAAABVPWNZBKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSG44TQNBSHAZDMNQ> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>