Testing a New Stalebot in GitHub's Community Discussions #70478
Replies: 13 comments 2 replies
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
-
@queenofcorgis Since you're showing the sample copy, presumably that's meant to invite input, so I have a suggestion:
...The message could just link to the "recent stalebot announcement" (that'd be this discussion, #70478), instead of sending us on a scavenger hunt. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
-
Hi How can I talk to the creator/Dev of Zello as I have a proposition for him, if you could get in touch at [redacted] I would be grateful to talk with you, Best regards, Anton. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
-
Thanks for being so considerate by only limiting it to the "Question" category and not closing discussions directly. The As you mentioned, many of the questions here are answered by GitHub staff or at least someone from the community. But some also seem to have no answer at all (discussions with label Do you think that is a problem, and will you try to address that? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have no idea what your talking about?
I have not been speaking on Github at all?
Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.
…------- Original Message -------
On Tuesday, 31 October 2023 at 22:33, Marcono1234 ***@***.***> wrote:
Thanks for being so considerate by only limiting it to the "Questions" category and not closing discussions directly.
The stale action (and other similar actions) are known to be quite disruptive in some cases, see [actions/stale#719](actions/stale#719), when they close issues where the maintainer has simply not responded yet. Or in this case here, acting on questions (possibly even well written ones) where no one ever commented on.
As you mentioned, many of the questions here are answered by GitHub staff or at least someone from the community. But some also seem to have no answer at all (discussions with label stale and only a single comment). In that case only action 1, "Close as Out of Date", would be relevant.
Do you think that is a problem, and will you try to address that?
—
Reply to this email directly, [view it on GitHub](#70478 (comment)), or [unsubscribe](https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APTMZUIXZZXQKCWO25GGT7TYCF4FBAVCNFSM6AAAAAA6FZCW42VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43SRDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHM3TINBQGIZTM).
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
-
Oh, no, that was me, sorry.
I am trying to get Zello to speak to Cloudron, so we can use Zello on Cloudron.
We have been discussing what apps we would like on Cloudron that's all.
I do apologies.
Best regards
Anton Paradise
Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.
…------- Original Message -------
On Thursday, 2 November 2023 at 21:37, Surya permana ***@***.***> wrote:
Pleass
—
Reply to this email directly, [view it on GitHub](#70478 (comment)), or [unsubscribe](https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APTMZUKOEOYSCT6OHX5U4F3YCQHANAVCNFSM6AAAAAA6FZCW42VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43SRDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHM3TINRRGQYTS).
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@queenofcorgis sadly, this is in the announcements category, because I'd really like to see the action mark this discussion as stale. I'd like to hear if you in fact ran this action and what the results were. I personally hate the stale bot. (That I send PRs to it is not an endorsement, it's awful software for a lousy purpose.) There appear to be two constructive pieces of feedback here:
There's also a PR relating to this discussion: One problem with bots is that they make a mess of sorting (by last modified) by bubbling up stale items. Sure, it might breathe be life into a thing, but, for a system built around searching, that isn't worth doing. If someone's searching for a thing, they'll find or not find it based on their search and the text of the item. A better approach would be to improve the UX flow so that authors are encouraged to yes/no answers as they arrive. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
TL;DR - What is happening?
We are working to improve the quality of content across the GitHub Community Discussions. For the next 30 days we are going to perform a test using a custom action to label
Question
discussions that have not had any activity for 60 days as stale. The action will apply the labelstale
and comment to inform the original poster of the stale discussion. Sample draft copy is included at the bottom of this announcement.📢 Feedback is requested on this initial test. Please comment on this post and let us know what you think!
What Discussions will be impacted?
Questions
and have not had and activity in the past 60 days as stale.What is a Stalebot?
Here is more info on this from the GitHub Docs: Closing inactive issues.
We're working with GitHub engineers to test this action in discussions!
Why are only limited categories impacted?
What will happen after the trial period?
Example Stalebot Copy:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions