fix: fix exportName mismatch #929
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
github-actions
bot
added
bug
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
designer-demo/public/mock/bundle.json (2)
Line range hint
1-8000: Review component configurations for potential issuesThe component configurations look well-structured with proper type definitions, descriptions and defaults. However, there are a few suggestions for improvement:
- Consider adding validation rules for numeric properties like
maxlength- Some event handler descriptions could be more detailed
- Consider adding examples in property descriptions
Line range hint
8000-20000: Review snippet templates for proper component usageThe snippet templates provide good starting points for component usage. A few suggestions:
- Consider adding more real-world examples with common use cases
- Add comments explaining the purpose of key properties
- Consider adding responsive layout examples
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
designer-demo/public/mock/bundle.json(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
designer-demo/public/mock/bundle.json (2)
9063-9063: Verify exportName change for Breadcrumb component
The exportName has been changed from "Select" to "Breadcrumb" for the TinyBreadcrumb component. This change looks correct since it matches the component's actual functionality.
10735-10735: Verify exportName change for Popeditor component
The exportName has been changed from "PopEditor" to "Popeditor" for the TinyPopeditor component. This change improves consistency with the component naming convention.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
packages/engine-cli/template/designer/public/mock/bundle.json (4)
Line range hint
1-8802: Consider reorganizing component categories for better maintainabilityThe component categorization could be improved by:
- Moving all form-related components (Input, Select, etc.) under a single "Form Components" category
- Creating a dedicated "Data Entry" category for specialized input components
- Separating layout components into their own category
This would make it easier to find and maintain related components.
Line range hint
14-1023: Fix inconsistent property type definitionsSeveral components have inconsistent or incorrect property type definitions:
- The
modelValueproperty has inconsistent types across components (string vs boolean)- Some numeric properties are defined as strings
- Missing validation rules for required properties
This could lead to runtime type errors.
Example fix for numeric property:
-"type": "string", +"type": "number",
Line range hint
3000-8802: Improve snippet reusability by removing hardcoded valuesThe snippets contain hardcoded values that should be parameterized:
- Hardcoded text content in buttons and labels
- Fixed dimensions in layout components
- Static data in table examples
Consider using placeholder values or configuration options.
Example improvement:
-"text": "按钮文案" +"text": "${buttonText}"
Line range hint
1-8802: Enhance component documentation for better developer experienceThe documentation could be improved by:
- Adding detailed descriptions for all components
- Including usage examples
- Documenting all available events and slots
- Maintaining consistent documentation format across components
This would help developers better understand and use the components.
English | 简体中文
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Background and solution
修复 TinyPopeditor 和 TinyBreadcrumb 物料配置错误的 bug
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Documentation