Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make toggling loaded GPS traces more user friendly #10803

Open
jidanni opened this issue Feb 22, 2025 · 8 comments
Open

Make toggling loaded GPS traces more user friendly #10803

jidanni opened this issue Feb 22, 2025 · 8 comments
Labels
usability An issue with ease-of-use or design

Comments

@jidanni
Copy link
Contributor

jidanni commented Feb 22, 2025

Today we are editing
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?gpx=11740137

OK, don't ask me why, but I have the sudden urge to turn off the trace.
You know, just get that pink line off the map. Just for a minute please.

Image

Sure, there it is, the

[ ] OpenStreetMap GPS traces

checkbox. But it is
unchecked already! (Of course, because it is referring to all traces,
not just this one trace.)

"Life is over. There's no way to get it off the map."

Then next time don't put that gpx=11740137 in the URL and your life
will get back on track, OK?

"But I'm already halfway through an edit, and the boss is coming up the
stairs, and they don't like pink. OK, and the trace shows I went into their private golf course. Help
fast!"

I mean sometime in the future there needs to be an additional checkbox, or some smarter method, to help the poor user in today's example.

@tyrasd tyrasd added the question Not Actionable - just a question about something label Feb 22, 2025
@tyrasd
Copy link
Member

tyrasd commented Feb 22, 2025

gps traces are loaded as custom map data overlays, and can be disabled/enabled in the map data panel:

That said, it could actually be a bit confusing that there is a very similarly named overlay layer… 🤔

@jidanni
Copy link
Contributor Author

jidanni commented Feb 22, 2025

No way.
I clicked the three dots, and there is nothing there about that layer.

Image

Seen in https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?gpx=11740137 .

@tyrasd
Copy link
Member

tyrasd commented Feb 24, 2025

just click on the ☑ checkbox:

Image

@jidanni
Copy link
Contributor Author

jidanni commented Feb 24, 2025

just click on the ☑ checkbox:

Image

And indeed, a miracle occurred. That worked!

And you must be a Ph.D. to have figured that out! So that button controls extra things not listed inside it. Perhaps they should at least also be listed inside it somehow.

That would also give users the power to turn off some of the things that master checkbox controls, instead of all of the things.

@tyrasd
Copy link
Member

tyrasd commented Feb 25, 2025

yeah, I agree that it's not very user friendly.

@tyrasd tyrasd added usability An issue with ease-of-use or design and removed question Not Actionable - just a question about something labels Feb 25, 2025
@tyrasd tyrasd changed the title Allow toggling off display of current single GPS trace Make toggling off loaded GPS traces more user friendly Feb 25, 2025
@tyrasd tyrasd changed the title Make toggling off loaded GPS traces more user friendly Make toggling loaded GPS traces more user friendly Feb 25, 2025
@DujaOSM
Copy link

DujaOSM commented Feb 25, 2025

Honestly, after 6000 edits in iD, I'm still having a hard time finding a checkbox that activates a certain overlay.

May I suggest moving option groups from the current "Background" and "Map Data" into a new "Overlays" option group, such as:

Image

That would also make the "Background" and "Map Data" lighter and easier to navigate.

@tordans
Copy link
Collaborator

tordans commented Feb 25, 2025

Honestly, after 6000 edits in iD, I'm still having a hard time finding a checkbox that activates a certain overlay.

I think for "power users" something like #8801 would be a great solution. I know the item am looking for, I just don't know where it is in the hierarchy of the UI … and with this I don't need to.

@DujaOSM
Copy link

DujaOSM commented Feb 28, 2025

One does not exclude the other... I still think that the way overlays are currently grouped in iD UI looks completely arbitrary. As I followed the development during last 6-7 years, those option groups started small but swelled over time, and now tend to occupy two screenfuls when expanded, as my mockup illustrates.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
usability An issue with ease-of-use or design
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants