Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Disconnected highway warning should suggest adding entrance nodes #6341

Open
1ec5 opened this issue May 9, 2019 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #10729
Open

Disconnected highway warning should suggest adding entrance nodes #6341

1ec5 opened this issue May 9, 2019 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #10729
Labels
validation An issue with the validation or Q/A code

Comments

@1ec5
Copy link
Collaborator

1ec5 commented May 9, 2019

The validator warning for a disconnected highway should suggest adding a building entrance node when the way is a footway and either end is connected to a building area. Otherwise, the need for a building entrance node may not be obvious to the mapper, because entrances are usually another level of micromapping beyond footpaths.

@1ec5 1ec5 added the validation An issue with the validation or Q/A code label May 9, 2019
@1ec5
Copy link
Collaborator Author

1ec5 commented May 10, 2019

I guess more broadly we could warn about a footway connecting to a building area and suggest adding a building entrance node in that case too, even if the other end connects to the footway network. We could also recommend noexit=yes in the case where a footpath goes right up to a building’s exterior wall but there’s no doorway.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
validation An issue with the validation or Q/A code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant