-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 406
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-32028: Decrease logs of haproxy #4245
OCPBUGS-32028: Decrease logs of haproxy #4245
Conversation
@mkowalski: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-29919, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/cc @cybertron |
/retest-required |
@mkowalski sounds like below logs still print after changing to
|
9f54b08
to
743fd42
Compare
I just modified to remove |
Yes, the logs do not show up after removing |
@mkowalski: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/cc @cybertron In my opinion access logs for haproxy are not really useful, I do not recall us ever looking into them |
/cherry-pick release-4.15 |
@mkowalski: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.15 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@mkowalski: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-32028, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: cybertron, mkowalski, sinnykumari The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
23df276
into
openshift:master
@mkowalski: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-32028: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-32028 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@mkowalski: new pull request created: #4313 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] This PR has been included in build ose-machine-config-operator-container-v4.16.0-202404102343.p0.g23df276.assembly.stream.el9 for distgit ose-machine-config-operator. |
No description provided.