[PRE REVIEW]: Lighter: Configuration-Driven Deep Learning

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @ibro45 (Ibrahim Hadzic)
Repository: https://github.com/project-lighter/lighter
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v0.0.3a20
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Chris Vernon

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f4a8d8e6d49eed6e18023b08c81fad91"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f4a8d8e6d49eed6e18023b08c81fad91/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f4a8d8e6d49eed6e18023b08c81fad91/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f4a8d8e6d49eed6e18023b08c81fad91)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @ibro45. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@ibro45 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.5281/zenodo.3828935 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Foundation model for cancer imaging biomarkers
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Vision foundation models for computed tomography

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.02701 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.98  T=0.06 s (1271.4 files/s, 148310.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          39           1190           1637           3020
Markdown                        23            718             20           1795
YAML                            11             49             75            334
TOML                             1             20             10            143
TeX                              1              3              0             87
CSS                              1             13              2             77
make                             1             14              6             49
SVG                              1              0              0             21
INI                              1              5              0             19
Dockerfile                       1              6              2             17
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            80           2018           1752           5562
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   107	Ibrahim Hadzic
    52	GitHub Action
    32	Suraj Pai
    12	dependabot[bot]
     3	repo-visualizer

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

⚠️ Wordcount for paper.md is 1278

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf. Problem with ORCID (0000-0000-0000-0000) for Ibrahim Hadzic. Invalid ORCID.

[ibro45]

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello @ibro45, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

[ibro45]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

brains-py, A framework to support research on energy-efficient unconventional hardware for machine learning
Submitting author: @ualegre
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @wob86, @sisco0
Similarity score: 0.6600

PyDGN: a Python Library for Flexible and Reproducible Research on Deep Learning for Graphs
Submitting author: @diningphil
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @idoby, @sepandhaghighi
Similarity score: 0.6589

omni-fig: Unleashing Project Configuration and Organization in Python
Submitting author: @felixludos
Handling editor: @gkthiruvathukal (Active)
Reviewers: @julianpistorius, @jarrah42
Similarity score: 0.6585

High-performance neural population dynamics modeling enabled by scalable computational infrastructure
Submitting author: @a9p
Handling editor: @emdupre (Active)
Reviewers: @richford, @tachukao
Similarity score: 0.6536

FuseMedML: a framework for accelerated discovery in machine learning based biomedicine
Submitting author: @alex-golts
Handling editor: @jmschrei (Active)
Reviewers: @anupamajha1, @suragnair
Similarity score: 0.6505

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[ibro45]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.5281/zenodo.3828935 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2211.02701 is OK
- 10.1038/s42256-024-00807-9 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2501.09001 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- None

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[ibro45]

@editorialbot check repository

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.98  T=0.06 s (1304.0 files/s, 152210.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          39           1190           1637           3020
Markdown                        23            719             20           1798
YAML                            11             49             75            334
TOML                             1             20             10            143
TeX                              1              3              0             89
CSS                              1             13              2             77
make                             1             14              6             49
SVG                              1              0              0             21
INI                              1              5              0             19
Dockerfile                       1              6              2             17
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            80           2019           1752           5567
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   108	Ibrahim Hadzic
    53	GitHub Action
    32	Suraj Pai
    12	dependabot[bot]
     3	repo-visualizer

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

⚠️ Wordcount for paper.md is 1202

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[ibro45]

Suggestions for potential reviewers:

• fepegar
• justusschock
• pmeier