Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: Heatwave Diagnostics Package: Efficiently Compute Heatwave Metrics Across Parameter Spaces #7860

Open
editorialbot opened this issue Feb 28, 2025 · 9 comments
Labels
pre-review Python Track: 6 (ESE) Earth Sciences and Ecology

Comments

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Submitting author: @AgentOxygen (Cameron Cummins)
Repository: https://github.com/AgentOxygen/HDP
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/071c99a9e9f52348df4de69ccdee5133"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/071c99a9e9f52348df4de69ccdee5133/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/071c99a9e9f52348df4de69ccdee5133/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/071c99a9e9f52348df4de69ccdee5133)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @AgentOxygen. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@AgentOxygen if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
@editorialbot editorialbot added pre-review Track: 6 (ESE) Earth Sciences and Ecology labels Feb 28, 2025
@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.05.014 is OK
- 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00383.1 is OK
- 10.1007/s00382-014-2434-8 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2402.00514 is OK
- 10.1029/2018EF000989 is OK
- 10.1002/2016GL069408 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- None

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.98  T=0.03 s (1237.1 files/s, 103418.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          19            398            366           1416
Markdown                         2             49              0            102
YAML                             5             14             14            102
TeX                              1              7              0             96
reStructuredText                 4             90             90             65
TOML                             1              6              0             43
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
Text                             1              0              0             13
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            35            576            478           1872
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   198	AgentOxygen
     5	Cameron Cummins

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Paper file info:

⚠️ Wordcount for paper.md is 1518

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

diyepw: A Python package for Do-It-Yourself EnergyPlus weather file generation
Submitting author: @amandadsmith
Handling editor: @timtroendle (Retired)
Reviewers: @samuelduchesne, @fneum
Similarity score: 0.6980

climpred: Verification of weather and climate forecasts
Submitting author: @bradyrx
Handling editor: @dhhagan (Retired)
Reviewers: @neerajdhanraj, @samjsilva91
Similarity score: 0.6888

heatwaveR: A central algorithm for the detection of heatwaves and cold-spells
Submitting author: @robwschlegel
Handling editor: @leeper (Retired)
Reviewers: @khaors
Similarity score: 0.6834

nctoolkit: A Python package for netCDF analysis and post-processing
Submitting author: @robertjwilson
Handling editor: @martinfleis (Active)
Reviewers: @malmans2, @platipodium
Similarity score: 0.6809

xclim: xarray-based climate data analytics
Submitting author: @Zeitsperre
Handling editor: @kthyng (Active)
Reviewers: @kthyng
Similarity score: 0.6808

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

@kthyng
Copy link

kthyng commented Mar 6, 2025

Hi @AgentOxygen and thanks for your submission! I am looking for some specific items to make sure your submission fits our requirements at a high level (not at the more detailed review level) before moving on to finding an editor or putting this on our waitlist if no relevant editors are available. I'll comment over time as I have a chance to go through them:

In the meantime, please take a look at the comments above ⬆️ from the editorialbot to address any DOI, license, or paper issues if you're able (there may not be any), or suggest reviewers. For reviewers, please suggest 5 reviewers from the database listed above or your own (non-conflicted) extended network. Their github handles are most useful to receive but please don't use "@" to reference them since it will prematurely ping them.

@AgentOxygen
Copy link

Hi @kthyng,

Here is a list of five potential reviewers and their GitHub handles:

  • Sam Silva: samjsilva91
  • Tammas Loughran: tammasloughran
  • Mattia Almansi: malmans2
  • Dillon J Amaya: dillon-amaya
  • Trevor James Smith: Zeitsperre

I am happy to provide any additional information that will help with the review process!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pre-review Python Track: 6 (ESE) Earth Sciences and Ecology
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants