Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: Pydre: A Python package for driving simulation data reduction #7706

Open
editorialbot opened this issue Jan 22, 2025 · 9 comments

Comments

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Submitting author: @tkerwin (Thomas Kerwin)
Repository: https://github.com/OSUDSL/pydre
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss
Version: v24.0.2
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/79fd5905b7753dbcc23cd9cde0969cb5"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/79fd5905b7753dbcc23cd9cde0969cb5/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/79fd5905b7753dbcc23cd9cde0969cb5/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/79fd5905b7753dbcc23cd9cde0969cb5)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @tkerwin. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@tkerwin if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.4271/2014-01-0452 is OK
- 10.1016/j.trf.2024.05.021 is OK
- 10.1109/SoutheastCon44009.2020.9249691 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- None

❌ MISSING DOIs

- 10.1201/b10836-21 may be a valid DOI for title: Simulator Data Reduction

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.98  T=0.04 s (2246.9 files/s, 153041.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          16            512            983           2102
JSON                            29             45              0           1063
TOML                            32            181              1            654
CSV                              6              0              0            444
Markdown                        11            176              0            330
Text                             1             23              0             96
YAML                             2              7              4             62
TeX                              1              3              0             46
CSS                              1              3              0              8
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            99            950            988           4805
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   266	BuildTools
   167	Thomas Kerwin
    78	Craig Fouts
    41	Allison Broccolo
    29	yu.2479
    16	Tiya Chhajed
    14	Kevin Smearsoll
    12	Josh
    11	Karthick Sivasubramanian
    11	karthicksiva
    10	Aashka Baruah
     9	Allyson Boone
     9	Peter Yu
     7	Cameron Wrabel
     7	abbyatchleyy
     7	tiyachhajed
     6	LAPTOP-6SCSKCBVouts
     5	Saana
     5	Shreyas Chaudhari
     4	Will Blanton
     4	unknown
     3	Kendra Harder
     2	Casey Schomer
     2	Maggie Wilson
     2	Margaret Wilson
     2	Viren Gadkari
     2	maggieowilson
     1	DrIMBA
     1	JWHI7830
     1	Zachary Ritter

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1001

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

License info:

🟡 License found: Other (Check here for OSI approval)

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Simulation Decomposition in Python
Submitting author: @tupui
Handling editor: @crvernon (Active)
Reviewers: @JoshuaOsborneDATA, @matt-graham
Similarity score: 0.7250

Pybehave: a hardware agnostic, Python-based framework for controlling behavioral neuroscience experiments
Submitting author: @theonlydvr
Handling editor: @sappelhoff (Active)
Reviewers: @tuliofalmeida, @alustig3
Similarity score: 0.7133

PySD: System Dynamics Modeling in Python
Submitting author: @rogersamso
Handling editor: @pdebuyl (Active)
Reviewers: @blsqr, @sixpearls
Similarity score: 0.7060

RidePy: A fast and modular framework for simulating ridepooling systems
Submitting author: @fxjung
Handling editor: @diehlpk (Active)
Reviewers: @xoolive, @abhishektiwari, @ixjlyons
Similarity score: 0.7040

BoxKit: A Python library to manage analysis of block-structured simulation datasets
Submitting author: @akashdhruv
Handling editor: @kellyrowland (Active)
Reviewers: @rvg296, @Abinashbunty
Similarity score: 0.6994

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Jan 24, 2025

👋 @tkerwin – could you take a look a this list of potential reviewers and identify a few people who would be good candidates to review this submission?

@tkerwin
Copy link

tkerwin commented Jan 24, 2025

Perhaps users ajoer and fredshone would be interested.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants